- Unit-tests are a “living document” that reflects the intended use of the software.
- Advantage of many small unit-tests: allows you to narrow down the scope of failure upon change.
- A unit-test cares about its class only.
- You typically have more lines of UT code than actual code.
- TDD is ATRIP:
- Automatic,
- Thorough,
- Repeatable (doesn’t depend on dynamic data),
- Independent (one class only),
- Professional (well written, commented, easy to maintain).
- VS2008 Professional will include Unit-Testing (This one triggered a round of aplause).
- Test-driven development: Red, Green,Refactor.
- Red: make it fail. Ensure the test fails with a method that's not yet implemented.
- Green: make it work. Code the minimum to satisfy the test (even if the code is crap).
- Refactor: make it better. Improve the code, make it easier to maintain.
- TDD requires discipline (no kidding).
Pair programming: one writes the unit-tests, the other writes the implementation.
Wednesday, 6 June 2007
Wednesday: Unit-Testing and Test-Driven Development
Yeaaaahh ! I scanned my office T-Shirt and I won a version of Office Ultimate 2007! Not the standard, the full one! How cool is that? It costs £480 on Amazon.co.uk...
Also attended a session about unit-testing and TDD:
DEV347 - Unit Testing and Test Driven Development
Wednesday, June 6 10:15 AM - 11:30 AM, N310 A
DEV347_randell.pptx
Speaker(s): Brian Randell, Doug Seven
This kind of completes the talk Ron Jacob gave about Model View Presenter on Monday - the purpose of MVP is to make it possible to automate GUI unit-testing.
Doug and Brian's presentation was energetic with colourful slides and very little text. Efficient demos: Doug did the talking, Brian the typing.
In a nutshell, this is what they said:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment